Skip to content
Spectrum Family Law Logo
  • Areas of Family LawExpand
    • DivorceExpand
      • Divorce Mediation
      • Collaborative Law
      • Uncontested Divorce
      • Joint Divorce
    • Child Custody
    • Child Support
    • Surrogacy & Fertility Law
    • Spousal Support
    • Maintenance Enforcement Program
    • Marital Property Division
    • Common Law Separation
    • Marriage AgreementsExpand
      • Cohabitation Agreements
      • Prenuptial Agreement
      • Separation Agreements
    • Real Estate for Families
    • Coaching & Self-Representation
  • Locations & TeamExpand
    • Meet Your Team
    • Locations
    • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Awards & Recognition
  • Knowledge CentreExpand
    • Alberta Family Law
    • BC Family Law
    • Divorce Deep Dive
    • Child Support
    • Separation Info
    • Mediation Tips
    • Vancouver Articles
    • Calgary Articles
    • Edmonton Articles
Get Help Now
Spectrum Family Law Logo

Who Decides Whether Grandparents Can Have Contact with the Children After Parents Separate?

Hours Updated onMarch 15, 2023 Categories AB
Who Decides Whether Grandparents Can Have Contact with the Children


When couples separate or divorce, extended family members may have concerns about their ability to continue to spend time with the children of the relationship.

In particular, grandparents, who may have previously enjoyed a close relationship with the children, can find themselves wondering what they can do if the parents’ separation or divorce has resulted in their access to the children being diminished, or even cut off entirely.

Conversely, parents who for various reasons may have objections to the continued involvement of grandparents or extended family in the care of the children may also wonder what their options are.

In the recent decision of VW v AT, 2022 ABCA 261, the Alberta Court of Appeal provided some guidance concerning principles that may apply when grandparents seek an order for contact with the children, against the wishes of the parents.

Learn More → Top Reasons Not to Self-Represent in Alberta Family Law Matters

Table of Contents
  • The Circumstances in VW v AT
    • The Test for Access
  • Parental Autonomy

The Circumstances in VW v AT

The VW case involved the perhaps unusual situation of parents who, although separated, were united in their opposition to allowing the maternal grandparents to have contact with the children. The grandparents had previously been very involved in the children’s lives. However, the parents expressed discomfort with what they described as racist, sexist, classist, anti-Semitic and homophobic beliefs of the grandparents, as well as their views on discipline and parenting.

Since 2018, there had been no in-person contact between the children and the grandparents, although they did have contact through social media without the parents’ consent. The children indicated they wanted a relationship with the grandparents.

Following an application by the grandparents, an order granting them contact with the children was issued, and two supervised visits occurred in August and September 2021. The parents however appealed the order and obtained a stay preventing further visits pending hearing of the appeal.

On appeal, the parents were successful, and the order providing for contact between the grandparents and the children was vacated. The Court’s reasons for granting the appeal provide important insight into how access disputes between parents and grandparents are likely to be approached.

The Test for Access

The parents in VW were not married, and therefore the matter was decided under Alberta’s Family Law Act (“FLA”), rather than the Divorce Act.

Section 35(1) of the FLA provides that a court “may, on application by any person, including a guardian, make an order providing for contact between a child and a person who is not a guardian.” Section 35(5) provides that before granting a contact order, the court must be satisfied that contact is in the child’s best interests, and the section specifically directs courts to consider whether:

  1. the child’s physical, psychological or emotional health may be jeopardized if contact between the child and the person for whom contact with the child is proposed is denied, and
  2. the guardians’ denial of contact […] is unreasonable.

According to the Court, the correct test under s. 35(5) is not whether the children’s interests would be jeopardized if contact is permitted, but rather whether they would be jeopardized if contact is denied. The Court of Appeal in VW held that the chambers judge had misapplied this test, and granted the parents’ appeal on that basis:

[28] It was for the grandparents to establish that if contact was denied, the children’s physical, psychological or emotional health may be jeopardized. By stating the issue was whether contact would be permitted, the chambers judge reversed the onus.

As the Court pointed out, this formulation of the test also places the burden of presenting evidence to support the best interests analysis on the grandparents, not the parents.

Ultimately, VW indicates that to grant an order for contact between grandparents and grandchildren, a judge must find that there is “a risk of harm to the child if contact which has been found to enhance the child’s best interests is removed” (citing BM v JM, 2019 ABCA 503).

Parental Autonomy

In VW, the parents had made the further argument that as parents, they should have the autonomy to decide who has contact with their children, and that the chambers judge was in error to order contact with the grandparents against their wishes. Although the Court did not have to address this argument in order to decide the appeal, it nevertheless provided opinion on this point.

The Court reiterated that decisions related to access for grandparents are made by looking to the best interests of the child and weighing relevant factors to assess whether access should be granted. The FLA provides a lengthy enumeration of specific factors that courts are directed to take into consideration in evaluating best interests. The list is not exhaustive, and courts are not precluded from considering additional elements that they may find relevant in individual cases.

The Court found that the position put forward by the parents in VW amounted to an argument that parental autonomy is essentially paramount – ie, that it may take precedence over other considerations that form part of the best interests analysis. The Court disagreed with that view, and declined to recognize “parental autonomy as a right that overrides the best interests of the child or that parental decisions are prevailing in determining the best interests of the child.”

On the contrary, the Court emphasized that the views of the parents are simply one factor to be taken into account in determining whether contact with grandparents is in the children’s best interests:

[50] The Family Law Act at s. 18 enumerates factors a court must consider in determining the best interests of the child. The list includes consideration of the parents’ wishes as s. 18(2)(ix) provides for “the views of the child’s current guardians”. There is no basis for this Court to interpret parental wishes as having priority. Ultimately, the best interests of the child are paramount. The chambers judge did not err in not deferring to the parents’ decision.

The VW decision highlights thecareful and context-specific inquiry that is generally required when disputes over grandparents’ access to children arise. As the Court’s reasons emphasize, there is no presumption that access should, or should not, be permitted.

However, it is also clear that in assessing the children’s best interests under the FLA, grandparents will bear the onus of demonstrating that the children’s physical, psychological or emotional health would be jeopardized if contact is denied.

We currently have three offices across Alberta — Edmonton, Calgary, and Red Deer. We serve the entire province of Alberta (and BC). We also have the infrastructure to work with any of our clients virtually — even the furthest regions of Alberta.

Call 780-756-0076 [toll free 1-855-892-0646] to get routed to the best office for you or contact us online to schedule an appointment.

We also have a dedicated intake form to help you get the ball rolling. Our intake team will review your specific case and advise you on the next steps to take as well as what to expect moving forward.

Our offices are generally open 8:30 a.m.—4:30 p.m., Mon—Fri.

Learn More → Reasons why you need to hire a family lawyer

Spectrum Family Law Seal
Kristin Smith - Spectrum Family Law

Kristin Smith

FAMILY LAWYER

Kristin strives to provide strong advocacy and sound legal advice to her clients while guiding them through their family law matters. She has developed a practice that takes an empathetic and practical approach while seeking client-​centered, cost-effective solutions.

  • Learn More About Kristin
End Block Form

Our expert intake staff are standing by.


We Can Help
Tell us a bit about your problem — we can fix it.

Recent Posts

  • Estate Planning Lawyers in EdmontonMarch 25, 2023
  • Adult Interdependent Partners: What Rights Do Partners Have?March 22, 2023
  • Property Exemptions When Couples Divorce or Separate in AlbertaMarch 22, 2023

A methodology of alternative dispute resolution

You control the outcome that works best for you – rather than a judge who hears your case.

We are expert family law litigators, however we do so with an understanding of the emotional stress that litigation can sometimes have on our client and the existing family unit.

Our team will advise you on the benefits of alternative dispute resolution, including mediation and arbitration. These alternative methods empower the parties to negotiate an outcome that accounts for their respective interests in a non-adversarial setting – minimizing disruption to your family.

Cost-effective, timely relief. Get Help Here
The Canadian Bar Association
Law Society of Alberta
Law Society of British Columbia
Three Best Rated Award
Martindale-Hubbell Logo
Better Business Bureau Accredited
We can help you get your life back.
Join Team Spectrum!

We're looking for highly motivated associates to join our busy team.
Spectrum Family Law offers competitive compensation and a spirited corporate culture.

Click Here for more info
EDMONTON

205, 10216-124 Street Edmonton, Alberta T5N 4A3
Local: (780) 756-0076
Toll-Free: 1 (855) 892-0646

CALGARY

211, 11 Ave SW Suite 620 Calgary, Alberta T2R 0C6
Local: (403) 452-0043
Toll-Free: 1 (888) 410-1677

VANCOUVER

202 - 905 W Broadway Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 1K3
Local: (778) 452-0221
Toll-Free: 1 (877) 402-1004

RED DEER

#17-104, 4808 Ross Street Red Deer, Alberta T4N 1X4
Local: (587) 441-6424
Toll-Free: 1 (855) 348-2033

MORE

Contact Us
Payments
Privacy Policy
Terms of Use
Disclaimer



We are inclusive - © 2023 Spectrum Family Law - Sitemap

Linkedin Facebook Twitter
  • Areas of Family Law
    • Divorce
      • Divorce Mediation
      • Collaborative Law
      • Uncontested Divorce
      • Joint Divorce
    • Child Custody
    • Child Support
    • Surrogacy & Fertility Law
    • Spousal Support
    • Maintenance Enforcement Program
    • Marital Property Division
    • Common Law Separation
    • Marriage Agreements
      • Cohabitation Agreements
      • Prenuptial Agreement
      • Separation Agreements
    • Real Estate for Families
    • Coaching & Self-Representation
  • Locations & Team
    • Meet Your Team
    • Locations
    • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Awards & Recognition
  • Knowledge Centre
    • Alberta Family Law
    • BC Family Law
    • Divorce Deep Dive
    • Child Support
    • Separation Info
    • Mediation Tips
    • Vancouver Articles
    • Calgary Articles
    • Edmonton Articles